The National Organization for Marriage, which is ironically against all forms of marriage but heterosexual ones, has announced that their President Maggie Gallagher will be stepping down and replaced by executive director Brian Brown. Maggie will be staying on a special executive committee that will allow her to continue to make inflammatory and factual incorrect accusations against homosexuals and anyone else she personally dislikes. On this committee, we can assume she will continue to rail against gay relationships of any kind as well as lambast proponents of abortion, sex education and common sense. Mrs. Gallagher was a former unwed mother before she founded NOM. Thankfully she realized her personal mistakes and direct assaults on her own moral views had no impact on her ability to judge others, all while holding a degree in (wait for it) religious studies.
Brian has not only “overseen” — he has instigated and created (under God) NOM’s incredible growth in less than three years: from one donor to 35,000, from no activists to over 500,000, from zero public profile to the recent public acknowledgment by the Washington Post that NOM has emerged as the “pre-eminent national organization fighting the legalization of same-sex marriage.” In less than three years, NOM has compiled an incredible record of victories (forging coalitions and working with many others who also deserve the credit, we never forget): putting Prop 8 on the ballot in California, overturning gay marriage in Maine, blocking gay marriage bills in New York and New Jersey, fighting in court to protect marriage activists from legal harassment, helping turn “scozzfava” into a verb. (To “scozzfava” a politician is to inform GOP primary voters that he or she is pro-gay marriage).
I contact a professor of Unicorn studies and Shamrock magic, but have yet to hear their views on this policy change. Hopefully their intense educational fortitude will shine further light on this shake up.

The Washington DC City Council is close to voting on same sex marriage rights. You can watch the live feed here and hopefully catch some good old fashion bigotry by screaming bat shit crazy Barry.
After watching the live feed, it really is obvious why politicians never get anything done. All of the long and pointless speeches and back patting is tiresome and dull. Whatever the case, something is coming, let’s hope it’s what we all expect and deserve.


"Is that a positive depiction of gays and lesbians inside your mouth? Here let me just get that real quick..."
In her article, which you can read here, Jennifer Vanasco, editor in chief of 365gay.com and Huffington Post.com contributor, takes aim at the former American Idol contestant and discusses the hypocrisy seated within Lambert’s AMA performance as well as his personal views on his sexuality.
“You told Out Magazine that you didn’t make a big deal out of your sexual orientation during American Idol once pictures of you kissing a man had been exposed because:
“I don’t understand why it has to be about my sexuality. I’m just not going to talk about it one way or another. . . . And then when those pictures came out, I was like, you know what? I thought maybe I’ll just own it and say, ‘Yeah, I’m gay.’ But I didn’t want to label myself.”
That’s interesting, Adam Lambert. When you were worried about winning a contest, you didn’t want to openly attest to being gay. (And, in fact, your people were worried that you would seem “too gay” on Out’s cover.) BUT, when you wanted to make a splash in public, when you wanted to get noticed – suddenly you were all about gay sexuality.”
Vanasco goes on to criticize Lambert for his timing and lack of responsibility as a pop culture figure during a period of political uncertainty for the LGBT community.
Personally I don’t agree with everything Vanasco says in her article. I think she comes off a bit irrational and her article’s title doesn’t hide her disdain for Lambert as a public figure either, but she does have some valid points. For ABC to even acknowledge the measly 1,500 complaints about Adam Lambert’s performance and then cancel his Good Morning America performance the following day, when the entire show was loaded with acts from straight, female performers shaking their beef baskets in front of the masses, was not only incredibly hypocritical but nothing more than a knee jerk reaction to a situation that needed no handling.
No matter what your views may be on the situation, one thing is clear. It’s a telling sign of our society that a badly choreographed song and dance by a boy in eyeliner has more political sway than all of the elected representatives and grass roots campaigns combined.
I’m depressed now. I need a little cake.

10 year old Arkansas student, Will Phillips, has refused to say the pledge of allegiance until all people are treated equally.
In this clip you will see young Will with his father, explaining his reasons for feeling this way and the thought process that led up to it. If you notice, he looks like Harry Potter just a tad bit and that makes this clip even better.
Am I nerd?
Screw you.


What a conundrum
The good folks at America Forever have gone and faxed a bajillion faxes around the country, decrying the recent half assed attempt at acceptance from the Mormon Church. Whatever it is that the church was hoping to accomplish with their shenanigans, seems to be blowing up in their face. Progressive people don’t trust the church and see their announcement as a thinly veiled attempt to deflect criticism that is being lobbed their way, while conservatives are going on the attack, furious that the Mormon church “caved” into gay demands by agreeing they had the right to work without prejudiced.
Once again, I think it’s only fair to offer them the same courtesy and fire them for being poorly educated mouth breathers.
On November 10th ,the Salt Lake City City Council, passed an ordinance for the city of Salt Lake to extend protection for Gays, Lesbians, Transgender and Bisexuals from discrimination on employment and housing. Although the church extended their support publically, since the gays have moved into Salt Lake City to elect officials to pass laws in their behalf, they already had all the votes they needed and did not need The LDS Church’s support to pass it. It was all a trap to show that the church runs the state and to sway the citizens of the entire state in support of this same bill, and other bills in the Common Ground Initiative in the state legislature that promote homosexuality and attack marriage. Why did the church do this when we know where The LDS Church stands? We all know that there must be a good reason for the church to be taking this political stand in support of this ordinance. One could do some research and read The Salt Lake Tribune article on November 11th, to understand what went on.
The LDS Church gave its support to this ordinance under the ground of fairness, because politically, the church needed to protect the entity of the church. It was necessary for the church to be carved out of having to hire and rent to gays, lesbians, transgenders, and bisexuals. This act of joining and giving them public support allows them, The LDS Church and all other Religions, to discriminate against people with different sexual conduct because it is against what they believe to be moral. However, businesses and citizens, even with the same religious beliefs do not have this right according to the new ordinance. It means SEAGULL BOOKS, HERITAGE SCHOOLS AND EVERY CITIZEN WHO HAS THE SAME MORAL STANDARDS WILL BE FORCED TO NOT DISCRIMINATE. Businesses who hire a man, and tomorrow he comes to work dressed up as a woman, cannot fire him. An old lady who rents a basement to two young men, not knowing they are gay and later sees them in their backyard barbecuing with their gay friends kissing and she doesn’t want to be around that, she cannot tell them to move. How many will be fired, and their employers do not even know that they are gay, and some may not even be, and yet they will say they are.
This is a bad ordinance; The LDS Church had to show its support, so that religion could be carved out. However, this law is nothing but unfair to all other religious and non-religious citizens. Furthermore, The LDS Church’s worse enemy of this century are the gays, they have persecuted the church, and in recent events when the church arrested 2 gay men kissing in the Main Street Plaza, the church caved in to protect themselves and to stop the harassment and lawsuits from the gays who were arrested in the Main Street Plaza.
After looking at their site for a while, two things have come to my attention.
1. Their site is horribly designed and as ugly as the childrens music they produce. I sent them an email offering my services for a very fair and very homosexual price.
2. They have no idea what they are mad at, other than the typical social conservative nonsense. Blacks are everywhere, Gays are alive, God is not cool anymore. Blah blah blah.
It’s one thing to be this crazy and hateful as an adult, but they have dragged their kids into it as well. Take a moment and listen to this wonderful song and by wonderful I mean very poorly written and sung by tone deaf children and what sounds like a man giving birth through his urethra. Whoo!
If you have not had enough of them yet, check out this great video sang to the tune of that grandpa song from the Simpsons. Yeah, I could have figured out the name of the actual song, but I honestly don’t care, so you just calm the fuck down!
It really is a horribly offensive and ignorant bunch of nonsense and fear. We should have the right to gather up these people and send them to Iran, so they can live in a theocracy, or better yet. Let’s just eat them. Vegetarians can watch.


Full of shit, Full of saline
In her newly released book Carrie wrote, “God gave us our bodies, and it’s perfectly right that we use them in ways where we can give glory to God by making our bodies, our temples of the Holy Spirit, strong and fast.”
Ha!
Not only was she caught red fingered(?) with a masturbation video after she had spent the last year traveling around as the christian mouth piece of hypocrisy, but now she has been caught red handed 38 more times. Apparently, when she had claimed she had felt horrible for the video, she had to engage in naked sexomania another 38 more times until the moral lessons had set in. I can relate to that, because sometimes I have to masturbate 2 – 3 times before I really feel at peace. Carrie and I are like lone sex warriors, except I never claimed to be a virgin. I just lament it.
TMZ has obtained several more pictures and major porn company Vivid Entertainment has somehow gotten their hands on a copy of her alleged finger walking wank session. There have been several stories circulating that Prejean was only 17 during the filming of these videos, but more and more evidence is surfacing that she was of legal age to pleasure herself for the enjoyment of others. I just barfed a little.
Now, these TMZ photos have not been found by myself and I won’t be posting them on here because I really don’t want to see some naked idiot talking out of their ass. I can just as easily do that in the shower by myself. However, if I do come across them, I may link to them in the hopes that even more people see this ideologue for what she is.
Let this be a lesson to all of you holy rollers. Keep your faith to yourself and don’t step on the rights of others. If you can’t follow these simple rules then I suggest you create a time machine and go back through your life, making sure you don’t do anything remotely sexual, lest we find your perversity and show the world the hypocritical bitch you are.


This is what the Pope reminds me of. He wants his precious back!
Catholics, you never cease to amaze me. Now, before some of you go on about how you don’t agree with many of the churches standards, but still consider yourself a Catholic… well you are just as bad. It would be the same thing if I joined the KKK and contributed to the cause, went to the meetings, but openly told my friends that I felt lynching was archaic and tacky. You support it, you are responsible for it’s practices. The same thing goes to you gay Mormons. Yes, there are several of you that I am looking at. (point point)
Finger pointing aside.
The Catholic Church of D.C. has stated that if the same sex marriage bill is passed, they will no longer be able to keep their contracts with the city, effectively terminating their social services work. In a stunning upset, from a usually compassionate and logical… oh no wait. I was thinking about that Yo Gabba Gabba show.
So, if I gather this correctly, the church is planning on punishing thousands of innocent and destitute people because the queerosexuals may be getting married? Well as long as we don’t forget the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Under the bill, headed for a D.C. Council vote next month, religious organizations would not be required to perform or make space available for same-sex weddings. But they would have to obey city laws prohibiting discrimination against gay men and lesbians.
Fearful that they could be forced, among other things, to extend employee benefits to same-sex married couples, church officials said they would have no choice but to abandon their contracts with the city.
“If the city requires this, we can’t do it,” Susan Gibbs, spokeswoman for the archdiocese, said Wednesday. “The city is saying in order to provide social services, you need to be secular. For us, that’s really a problem.”
Several D.C. Council members said the Catholic Church is trying to erode the city’s long-standing laws protecting gay men and lesbians from discrimination.
I honestly don’t have much to say on this subject at the moment, but for those of you who may be curious as to why I despise religion, take note.
“Lets say an individual caterer is a staunch Christian and someone wants him to do a cake with two grooms on top,” said council member Yvette M. Alexander (D-Ward 6), the sponsor of the amendment. “Why can’t they say, based on their religious beliefs, ‘I can’t do something like that’?”
After the vote, the archdiocese sent out a statement accusing the council of ignoring the right of religious freedom. Gibbs said Wednesday that without Alexander’s amendment and other proposed changes, the measure has too narrow an exemption. She said religious groups that receive city funds would be required to give same-sex couples medical benefits, open adoptions to same-sex couples and rent a church hall to a support group for lesbian couples.
Peter Rosenstein of the Campaign for All D.C. Families accused the church of trying to “blackmail the city.”
“The issue here is they are using public funds, and to allow people to discriminate with public money is unacceptable,” Rosenstein said.
Rosenstein and other gay rights activists have strong support on the council. Council member Phil Mendelson (D-At Large), chairman of the judiciary committee, said the council “will not legislate based on threats.”
“The problem with the individual exemption is anybody could discriminate based on their assertion of religious principle,” Mendelson said. “There were many people back in the 1950s and ’60s, during the civil rights era, that said separation of the races was ordained by God.”
Catania, who said he has been the biggest supporter of Catholic Charities on the council, said he is baffled by the church’s stance. From 2006 through 2008, Catania said, Catholic Charities received about $8.2 million in city contracts, as well as several hundred thousand dollars’ worth this year through his committee.
“If they find living under our laws so oppressive that they can no longer take city resources, the city will have to find an alternative partner to step in to fill the shoes,” Catania said. He also said Catholic Charities was involved in only six of the 102 city-sponsored adoptions last year.
Terry Lynch, head of the Downtown Cluster of Congregations, said he did not know of any other group in the city that was making such a threat.
Read the entire article at The Washington Post
Posted by:

Carrie Prejean, self professed innocent mouth piece of god, has once against stepped into a pile of her own bullshit. This poor girl just can’t get a break and if I were her, I would be furious that god set me up only to be an idiotic bimbo with fake boobs.
After TMZ announced that Miss Prejean had made a sex tape, she quickly dropped her suit against Miss California USA. Awkward… apparently her mother was also in the room while the tape was being played. Double awkward…
Now Carrie has a new book out entitled, “Still Standing” and she has been traveling around the country trying her hardest to publicize this thing. It took me several minutes to find any mention of it online and that was only after several websites led me to products for anal douching. That just can’t be good news, especially in the world of publishing. Unless, of course, you are publishing a book about anal douche, then.. JACKPOT!
This week she found herself on the Larry King Live show, where she quickly made a public ass out of herself once again. Not only did she refuse to answer some simple and innocent questions about her lawsuit, but she went on to call Larry King “inappropriate”. Her thought process?
Larry King – “Thank you for appearing on my talk show tonight Carrie. I have a few questions for you regarding the recent news about you and your lawsuit against Miss California USA.”
Carrie – “You want to ask me questions on a talk show?! JEWS! ALL OF YOU!”
This is obviously a very naive and childish take on her internal monologue and we all know it would have gone something more like this.
Carrie – “Where am I?”
There you go.
Later on in the night, Anderson Cooper discuses the illogical behavior of Miss Prejean.
May I suggest a title for your second book?
“How I learned to shut the hell up.”
read more